Alexander Kozlitin Biography

Arguments like “these two were friendly, so he did not kill” seem to be lyrics. However, the murder motive put forward by the investigation is crumbling from such a lyrics, it seems unfounded and “attracted”. At the beginning of the indictment, this is what-"a criminal intent arose among Kozlitin, due to previously developed hostile relations." To others, such a wording seems frank nonsense.

Then the investigation complements the motive. Allegedly, Kozlitin had a “hobby” - to break ATMs. Once he called Alexander to accomplices - he refused. Kozlitin was afraid that a friend would tell and killed him. He did not interfere, because he was frightened, ”says the only witness of the murder. In this case, it is impossible to understand in this case.

He planned the murder of an old friend because he "knew too much." The killer is cautious. Then why take with you a terrible crime, a friend from work - Igor? To make another witness to appear? In addition, do not warn a witness that he is planning a murder. After all, it is impossible to guess the reaction of an involuntary witness. But what if he first runs to the police and tells about the crime?

Or prevents from killing a person? By the way, I did not do any or the other Igor. He just sat in the car. Near the friend, whom they shout. The more you learn about the case, the more questions appear to the logic of the “planned murder”. The victim’s car was found by volunteers and law enforcement officers. To her, as in a fairy tale about Genzel and Grettor, led the things of the deceased, scattered across the field.

Even the murder weapon - a linen rope - the offender left the criminal at the scene of the crime, or rather on the neck of the murdered. However, this version of the investigation seemed logical. For some reason, there was no other place. The version of the defendant himself Kozlitin himself did not plead guilty. The evening in which his friend was killed, he remembers completely differently.

Kozlitin rested at home after work. Suddenly, a guy from work called him - Igor. He asked for a visit, they say, he was just not far from his house. Kozlitin did not refuse. The guys took a walk with the dog, played in the PLETSIEN, drank beer. After some time, Alexander came to Kozlitin. All three talked in the car, then Kozlitin returned home, and Igor and Alexander left.

Several hours passed, already at night, knocked in the gate of Kozlitin. It was Igor again. Polina Kozlitin, the wife of the defendant: “He was already alone. He was scared, intoxicated. He was very bad. He said: “- I forgot your phone, whether you still have beer” Igor asked Kozlitin to stay with him until he was “letting go” the drug. Alexander agreed, but did not let him into the house: his wife is about to return from work, and she treats drugs poorly.

The men went towards the forest belts. On the way, they stopped at a gas station - they bought cigarettes and energy. At the gas station, both were visible to the video surveillance cameras. Subsequently, this video will be considered the only evidence that Kozlitin was at the crime scene. Polina Kozlitin, the wife of the defendant: “There is not a single evidence that confirms the guilt of Sasha, my husband.

The investigation has the testimony of a witness on which they built the entire chain of accusations to my husband. The fact that the investigation proves only that Igor Bykov was at the crime scene, but not the guilt of my husband. They have no material evidence at all. ”The search for the missing Alexander lasted more than ten days. The only witness of the murder was silent to the last.

As a result, in one of the interrogations he spoke about his version: Alexander killed Kozlitin. Igor explained the long silence that the killer was intimidated by the killer. But why didn’t Igor immediately hand over the criminal? After all, there was an opportunity. According to the witness, he and Kozlitin stopped at the gas station immediately after the murder.

He could run to the gas station, press the alarming button, wait for the police, show the corpse of the murdered and tell everything, but Igor did nothing of this. Only after the next interrogation did he call Kozlitin a killer. By the way, during the interrogation of this witness, for some reason was beaten, so much so that the ambulance even had to call the police. The defendant’s mother believes that her son was framed.

For a long time, Kozlitin sued the house with his ex -wife. The relationship went so much that the woman wanted to change the name of their common child. The defendant’s mother did not see her grandchildren for two years: “It seems to me that he was framed and framed well. It all started with this house, when the section of this house has occurred. ”Now the ex -wife of Alexander Kozlitin, married to a local detector.

The defendant had repeatedly complained to many that threats were addressed to him: “He repeatedly said that he had problems with his ex -wife, namely with the division of the house, because he divorced her. The current husband of his ex -wife, a police officer. Sasha said that there were already direct threats in his direction that if Sasha had any problems with the law, he would do everything to plant him for a real term.Sasha spoke about this repeatedly, not only to me, but to the whole team in which he used to be a foreman, ”recalls Andrei, a colleague of the defendant evidence that were collected at the very beginning of the investigation were not attached to the case.

From the house of Igor, the police seized as many as five samples of linen ropes approx. But it did not reach the examination - all the samples were destroyed by the investigator. The soil from car rugs was removed from the Kozlitin car: if the soil from the rugs coincided with the soil at the scene, it would be clear who was that night with Alexander and whose version is true.

Everyone was waiting for the results of the examination, but the soil, like linen ropes, was destroyed. Polina Kozlitin, the defendant’s wife “after conducting an examination on the ground, it would be clear that my husband was not there” Alexander was blown up because he knew that his friend was breaking ATMs. This is the main motive for the murder. However, evidence, the autopsy of the ATM to the accused is not.

And if Kozlitin did not rob an ATM, the meaning of Alexander’s murder disappears again. Then the investigation has a witness to the hacking of an ATM. The only witness of robbery was Igor again - a witness to the murder case. It turns out that everything is accused of Kozlitin is built on the testimony of the same person. In evidence that the defendant really “robber with experience” Igor told the investigation a story.

Allegedly, he and Kozlitin hacked the ATM together. One clung to the cable to the device, the other sat in the car and gave gas with a conditional signal. The ATM stood in the store, so there is a seller’s testimony in the case, who worked on a robbery day: “The guy opened the door. He was in camouflage. The face is closed by the black Balaklava - Ed. The car drove up, handed over, the hook broke off.

He entered the second time, also hooked on the ATM, went out and jerked. The hook flew away again, and they left. Someone was still behind the wheel, because someone was handing the car while he was doing it all here, ”comments on the attempt to rob Olga, the seller of the store Olga became the second witness in the case of an attempt to rob. The store in which it works is small - about 40 square meters, that is, the girl had the opportunity to consider the person who hacked the ATM.

She and Igor clearly say about different people: “He is the defendant, less somehow, his legs are not even, but he was thin, slender” according to the seller, the robber was dressed in camouflage, there was a mask and a hood on his head. The robbery attempt happened in April.

Then Kozlitin wore dreadlocks - a hairstyle that is difficult to hide under the hood. The accusation of the robbery of the defendant also does not agree: “The hood of the camouflage is quite small. There are no wide hoods of camouflage. It’s not like a hood, there’s no need to put a hat there. It is difficult to pull the usual average hat on the dreadlocks ”By the way, earlier Olga has repeatedly seen the defendant.

Not far from the store was his tattoo salon.