Grishaev Andrey Albertovich Biography

Andrei Albertovich Grishaev is an independent researcher, the author of a number of articles published on his personal website a new physicist, and the books of this digital physical world are its content: Section 1. Mass-10 1. The concept of local-absolute speed is 13 1. The rate of action of gravity is 51 2. The unitary effect of gravity is 53 2. How did the solar system make?

The general provisions of many probably fell into the next unpleasant situation. When reading an unfamiliar physical theory, it seems to you that it is built more or less true. But gradually, having met her better, you begin to notice serious mistakes in starting principles and inaccuracies in details. Next comes complete disappointment. You begin to regret the time spent on it. Almost all theories presented in the section “Criticism of modern physical theories and attempts to build new ones” have passed the described evolution inside me.

Not a single one is drawn to the impeccable concept, although the author does not always have the courage to report this to the author - it hurts you really do not want to upset it. In addition, to prove what exactly his theory is erroneous, a difficult matter, requiring a lot of effort and time. All of the said fully applies to the theory of Grishaev, nevertheless, I tried to express what exactly his theory is bad.

We will get acquainted with her from the “final phrases”, which I liked when first reading. They began with inspired criticism of all the current official science. Many will probably agree with the claims expressed by the author. He writes: “Talented loners read textbooks - naively believing that facts are set out in them. Not at all: the textbooks set out ready -made interpretations of facts adapted to the perception of the crowd.

Moreover, these interpretations would look very strange in the light of a genuine experimental picture, known for science. And for what? In order for the interpretation to look believable - being in accordance with official theoretical doctrines. In the words of the scholars, the husbands are beautiful: we are looking, they say, the truth, and the criterion of truth is practice.

But in reality, the criterion of truth is accepted theoretical doctrines. For, if the facts do not fit into such a doctrine, then they are not redrawing the theory, but the facts. After all, everything is fine. Atomic bombs explode! Satellites fly! Mobile telephones work! Well, how without her-you consider her the greatest achievement of scientific and technological progress! So let me culturally recall that you have no idea what the structure of composite nuclear nuclei is being held on.

This is called - do you understand how the atomic bomb explodes? You also add your famous pearl about the fact that you would not have done the atomic bomb without relativity ... ... Where does the theory of relativity have at least one experimental confirmation of its predictions? The concept of relative speeds for our world is unsuitable 1. Nobody found a relativistic reduction in the length of the length.

There is no relativistic and gravitational slowdown in nature 1. There is no relativistic growth of energy of energy, an impulse in nature also 4. The gravitational “red displacement” is the wrong interpretation of 1. Evidence that the “photons” twist their trajectories, flying next to the massive body - there could not be 3. For radio waves - the same 3.

Einstein's "explanation" of the centuries -old movement of Perigelia Mercury is ridiculous.

It, in particular, is based on the erroneous 2. And now they are trying to convince us that the atomic bomb was not to do without such a theory? Which, by the way, did not predict either a defect in the masses, or the chain reaction of the division of heavy nuclei! Worse-it is precisely because of the theory of relativity in physics that there is still no understanding of the nature of the defect of the masses.

But it is so simple: part of the masses of the binded nucleons turn into the energy of the connection, and the energy of communication does not have mass properties - here is the defect of the mass 4. What can I say, Einstein was injected specifically. And the atomic bomb was made not thanks to the theory of relativity, but contrary to it. No, we have nothing against the theory of relativity.

She is very in demand - being, in her way, a magnificent simulator for mental exercises of boys with a “excellent student complex” - who, along the mind, consider themselves especially gifted. But it is clear that with the help of barren intellects, divorced from experimental realities, not to create such a practical little thing as an atomic bomb. How everything is running! Big explosion, gravitational waves, black holes, dark matter ...

virtual particles, physical vacuum ... neutrinos, quarks and gluons, strings and superstrodes ... How could all this be believed?! Further, in the text of this “additions”, notes slip, alarming at all rationally thinking physicist: “In return, we offer a model of the“ digital ”physical world. This model is based on experimental realities, and not on the content of textbooks.

And this model of physical reality can be troubled by the model of the Unified Universe, covering not only the physical level of reality, but also its other levels ”additional.Any claims to create a “model of the Unified Universe” are doomed to failure. The scientist must be more modest, be able to limit himself to a specific field of research. The creation of the universal and universal system of the world is usually claimed by amateurs, relativists and magicians.

Most importantly, physical theory cannot reach other, not physical levels. The author admits "going beyond physical laws." He writes that “a science that recognizes the existence of only a physical level of reality is powerless to explain paranormal phenomena - and does not even see the difference between“ living ”and“ inanimate ”.” This model also implies the super -program level of reality - at the same time those who arranged all this.

” In rational theory, only normal phenomena can be considered, all paranormal should be explained in the framework of the physical world. Grishaev got the Napoleon cake. In its lower layer lies the physical world. A certain intangible program that controls this physical world rises above it. Then there is a super -program level, where for some reason they are included with a capital letter, "who arranged all this." Who are the "those"?

The design turned out to be mysterious. I would like to somehow deal with this hierarchy of material and intangible entities, that is, living and inanimate levels, for which we turn to the first section of the book. Immediately warn the reader: many provisions of the “digital” theory of Andrei Grishaev look strange and debatable. In particular, it is difficult to agree with the idea of ​​denying the self -sufficiency of the physical world.

It is necessary to “assume that there is a subphysical level of reality, where there are software requirements, which, firstly, form particles of substance at the physical level of reality and, secondly, set their properties, that is, they provide for options for physical interactions in which these particles can participate. The physical world is the same as it is is by no means itself: this is how it makes the appropriate software.

While this software is valid, the physical world exists. ”1. Denial of self -sufficiency of the physical world automatically implies the existence of the Creator, which is already self -sufficient. And the software of this world is also ”1. In a certain way, they transforms the energy of a substance from some forms into others - generating the illusion of the action of forces on a substance.

Sustainable nuclear and atomic structures also exist thanks to the work of the corresponding structural-forming algorithms. And even the light spreads thanks to the navigator program, which “paves the way” for him 1. The theory of gravity in the teachings of Grishaev is almost not used by the term creator, but the reader must remember that under the terms a program, an algorithm, a navigator, a control package, etc.

See how many problems the gravity posed before science. The Lord, through his software, simplifies and removes difficulties that exist in theory of gravity. For example, in p. How to understand this? Rather, on the contrary, this statement entails even greater contradictions. In fact, the path of a trial body located between the earth and the Sun will determine the radius of the attraction of the Earth in thousand.

That is, being at a distance of 1 million. However, this is the Typian body located between the Earth and the Moon, between which this collision can be circumvented? Yes, Grishaev answers. His book has two paragraphs: “Little radius of the action of the gravity of the moon” 2. In particular, in the item, the moon does not have its own frequency funnel and it “is not a continuous body, but a thin -walled shell”.

Well, even if the natural satellite of the Earth is an unusual celestial body.